Hmmm…It says here that your
assignment is to go see the Regina Little Theatre’s production
of Living
Together, which is playing from February 14 to 17. Well, it’s
not postcolonial insect imagery, but it’s still very interesting.
Fortunately for you, I studied this play a decade ago in English
378 and I kept all of my notes. (And they said these would never
come in handy – hah.)
The Norman Conquests is a trilogy
of plays written by British playwright and actor Alan Ayckbourn
in 1974…
Well, that is a very good question, Colleen. Yes, the play the
RLT is doing is called Living Together,
not The Norman Conquests. However,
Living Together is the second
play in this trilogy. The first one was
Table Manners, which the RLT did last year, and the last play
is Round and Round the Garden,
which, you never know, we could end up seeing on the main stage
next year. Here’s a gold star, dear. With an inquisitive
mind like that, you could be a journalist or something.
What makes these plays unique is that all three depict the same
characters over the same weekend, but each play takes place in
a different part of the house. Table
Manners is set in the dining room, Living
Together in the living room, and Round
and Round the Garden in, naturally, the garden. The audience
gets a different perspective of the action as well as new plot
information with each change of venue. The plays can be watched
in any order and stand on their own as individual plays, so you
don’t have to see them all to understand what’s going
on.
The Norman Conquests is written
in the tradition of the British bedroom farce. Does anyone know
what that is?
Yes, Nathan, you’re right. It’s a comedy that deals
with an absurd situation having to do with extramarital relations.
The women tend to be stronger and smarter than the men, who are
usually henpecked and dominated.
That’s a great answer. I seem to have run out of gold stars,
but here’s a blue one. I’ll just stick it to the centre
of your forehead…there.
The characters in Ayckbourn’s plays each fit a “type”
in the bedroom farce. Sarah is the “nagging housewife”
who is always stressed out and feels she’s the only one
keeping everything together. Reg is her “downtrodden spouse”,
the henpecked husband who depends on Sarah for everything. Annie
is the “frumpish virgin”, the responsible one in the
family who cares for their hypochondriac mother. Tom is the “dimwitted
rustic” who is trusting, reliable and stable, but is unable
to understand jokes or respond to romantic innuendos. Ruth is
the “icy career woman”, the breadwinner who was embarrassed
into marrying Norman and whom one would refer to as “nice.”
And Norman, well, what can you say about Norman? He doesn’t
fit into any category. He is a shaggy assistant librarian with
delusions of an uncontrollable sex drive…
Yes, Martin. I said “sex.” Quit giggling.
Ahem. As I was about to say, The Norman
Conquests is a commentary on relationships and marriage.
Ayckbourn believed that happy marriages weren’t worth writing
about. If my scrawling English class notes are correct, he once
said, “Comedy ends in marriage and tragedy begins a year
later.”
None of the characters in these plays is happy even through they
are all in relationships. Instead, they are tired, frustrated,
bored, stressed, depressed, angry, miserable. They got married
because it was expected of them by society.
Although Tom and Annie aren’t married, they are no better
off than the others. All of the relationships are dull, lacking
in passion and romance…
Martin, please don’t pull Sharon’s pretty red hair…Yes,
I do understand that you’re making a literary allusion to
Anne of Green Gables by calling
her “Carrots”, but it’s still not a very nice
thing to do.
Now, where was I? Ah, yes, so Ayckbourn uses the character of
Norman to shake things up – to challenge societal norms.
(Norms/Norman – you can’t tell me that’s a coincidence.)
Norman believes in passion and love, and although he’s an
unlikely romantic interest (he’s “built like a haystack”
and is quite obnoxious), he has affairs with each one of the women.
He disrupts the stability, rituals and comfortable world of the
other characters, serving as a catalyst to spur them into action…
Martin, please stop dancing on top of your desk. That is not
safe at all... Oh, you got Andrea to reinforce your desk with
steel cross braces for this very purpose? Well, that was a smart
thing to do, but it’s still very distracting while I’m
trying to teach. Please get down now.
Anyway, Norman brings out the hidden passion in the other characters,
changing their lives forever. The plays end with a token restoration
of order, but the endings of each are still unresolved or open.
Ayckbourn believes it is artificial to end a play with closure
because life isn’t perfect and tied up in a bow –
it continues on before and after the play…
Martin, is that a note you’re passing to Darcy? Let me
see that…It’s a picture of me with the caption, “Sabbie
smellz,” and there are stink lines and everything.
Well, that’s it. I’m taking you to the principal’s
office.
Class, you’re going to have to find me at the Green Room
party to learn more about The Norman
Conquests – such as how rituals of civility are challenged
throughout, and how the imagery of the Victorian home in decay
reflects the social and political atmosphere of the plays.
Patrick, you seem like a responsible manager type – I’m
leaving you in charge while I’m gone. The class assignment
is to read all of the Backstage with
Sabbie columns on the Regina Little Theatre website and
write an essay about how wonderful you think they are. Extra credit
if you email your essays to me as fan mail at: backstagewithsabbie@gmail.com...
No, Martin, you are not the embodiment of the Norman character
because you challenge societal norms with your behaviour –
you are just disrupting my lesson.
Sigh. There’s one in every class….
|